DUNBARTON BOARD OF SELECTMEN
MINUTES OF MEETING
THURSDAY, MAY 19, 2005
TOWN OFFICES – 7:00 P.M.
The regularly scheduled weekly meeting of the Dunbarton Board of Selectmen was held at the above time, date and place with Chairman Charles Graybill presiding. It was noted that the meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. The following were present:
Charles (Chuck) Graybill,
Chairman
Mert Mann
Les Hammond
Janice VandeBogart, Town
Administrator
The
Selectmen reviewed correspondence and signed checks prior to the Public Meeting
was called to order.
Mr.
Schroeder: Question re Stone Road:
Mr. Schroeder appeared before the Board and stated
that he had purchased 108 acres across the street from his home on
He stated that one of his options is he would like
to see if his abutters can purchase a portion of the property.
Mr. Schroeder stated he was trying to find out what
all his options are with regard to the property. He stated he needs to sell something in order
to pay for the lot but would like to keep it undeveloped.
The Board of Selectmen noted his options would be as
follows:
1.
Apply to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for a Variance to subdivide a
lot with less than the minimum required frontage.
a.
Les Hammond indicated that a Variance would be difficult to obtain
because Mr. Schroeder would have to prove hardship which he is creating himself
by subdividing. In addition, there is
Public Interest, etc. There is no way of
knowing if the Zoning Board would approve the Variance.
2.
Approach abutters and try to annex a portion of the lot to the rear of
the abutters’ lots. Mr. Schroeder stated he really has to sell a
building lot in order to get enough money to pay for the property.
3.
Mr. Schroeder presented a letter signed by Mert Mann, Chairman of the
Board of Selectmen, dated four or five years ago stating that the Selectmen
will allow for the upgrade of Stone Road if a subdivision occurs. At this point in the discussion, the
Selectmen stated that this letter no longer applies because it is outdated re
the current regulations. The Board of
Selectmen would require the upgrade of the entire length of the road if it were
subdivided now. This would be expensive to the
sub-divider.
4.
Mr. Schroeder could consult with a Surveyor to determine what his
options would be before going any further.
5.
Mr. Schroeder stated that the Town eventually will need land for a
school. Would this be a
possibility?
a.
Master Plan would possibly indicate a time frame for the need for a new
school, etc.
Ken
Swayze, Brief Follow-up on “Exactions”:
Ken Swayze, Building Department, reported on Exaction Fee to the Board as follows:
1.
Made reference to a case which made it to New Hampshire Supreme Court
(Simonsen vs.
2.
Starting in the 1980’s, 90’s and 2000, when the developer came in, he
was expected to provide the roads and was expected to provide “exaction”. Towns now do have Impact Fees, but many have
been applied haphazardly. You can’t have
it both ways. You can’t have both Impact
Fees and Exaction Fees. You have to be
fair and analyze things because there is no formula. It is what the development imposes on the
community. If you work out the costs for
the road, then “rationale nexus” theory.
If there is a development at the end of a two mile road and the Town
said the developer has to pay for the upgrade of the entire road, that would be
incorrect. It did benefit the
subdivision but the upgrade would be benefiting other undeveloped potential
lots on the road. Planning Boards and
Selectmen don’t have the sophistication but cities and some towns do it all the
time. A perfect example is sewer
extensions. When your septic system
fails you are going to pay for hooking into the Town sewer system at an
established cost.
3.
“Exaction” fees get complicated.
Each case is done differently.
Tucker Hill is another example.
The road improvements which they paid for directly benefited Tucker
Hill.
4.
Presented the Selectmen with a copy of RSA 674:21 (j) which states as
follows:
“(j) The failure to adopt an impact fee ordinance
shall not preclude a municipality from requiring developers to pay an exaction
for the cost of off-site improvement needs determined by the planning board to
be necessary for the occupancy of any portion of a development.”…………
5.
Noted that the Planning Board took out the requirement within the
regulations that developers have to give 5% of the total land volume to the
Town. This was illegal and was taken out
of the regulation because of that.
6.
7.
The exaction fee is determined by the total cost of the off site
improvements divided by the total number of lots which benefit from the off
site improvements. This figure is
assessed on a per lot basis. The
developer pays the Town the amount which they have been assessed per lot. The Town does the road improvements and then
assesses each undeveloped lot as it is developed. The Town budgets for the road improvements.
8.
Les Hammond stated that
9.
Selectmen noted they will need a Build Out Schedule for that area prior
to assessing “exaction” fee from the Chan’s.
Garden
Club:
Judy Peterson and Donna Dunn, Garden Club members, appeared before the Board of Selectmen with the following requests and comments:
1. Noted that the Garden Club is a non-profit private group within the Town. They provide money to the scholarship fund, beautify the Town Common, etc. They need fund raising projects to help meet their obligations.
2. One of their members had a suggestion of selling daffodils with a long term goal of ten years. This would bring spring color to the Town, etc. Looking for the Selectmen to officially sanction the project in conjunction with the 250th Anniversary of the Town. Looking for the Selectmen’s endorsement of the project.
3. The Garden Club will purchase the bulbs at wholesale prices and then sell them to local residents, etc. This will be a fund raiser for the Garden Club. Volunteers will sell the bulbs and include planting instructions, etc. The Town Common Fund could be used for the funds to purchase the bulbs and then would be reimbursed when the bulbs were sold.
4. Town Street Signs will be sold by Silent Auction on the Dunbarton Web Site. In addition, the Selectmen reminded Donna Dunn about the Vintage Traffic Light which was donated from the Town Garage.
5. Donna Dunn reported that regarding the Town Hearse Project, Harvey Provencher has taken some of the decayed boards and is in the process of seeing what he can do for replacement.
6. Les Hammond noted that a Memorial Tree on the Town Common needs to be replaced. After discussion with the Garden Club members, it was established that the Town should pay for the replacement tree.
The Selectmen reached a consensus that the Garden Club could operate the Daffodil Fund Raising Project in conjunction with the Town Common Project, and it would eventually be worked into the 250th Anniversary for the Town. There will have to be a Committee established for the 250th Anniversary to be held in 2015.
MOTION:
Mert
Mann made a motion that the Dunbarton Board of Selectmen go into non-public
session in accordance with RSA 91-A:3 at 8:00 p.m. to discuss personnel
issues. The motion was seconded by
Charles (Chuck) Graybill. The motion
passed with a roll call vote as follows:
Graybill
– Yes
Mann–
Yes
No
decisions or motions were made at the non-public session.
Mert
Mann made a motion that the Dunbarton Board of Selectmen adjourn the non-public
session to discuss personnel issues in
accordance with RSA 91-A:3 at 8:31 p.m.
Charles (Chuck) Graybill seconded
the motion. The motion passed with a
roll call vote as follows:
Mann
– Yes
Graybill
– Yes
Jeff
Crosby, Road Agent, Class VI Roads:
Jeff Crosby appeared before the Board with the following items:
1.
Jonathan Hammond had contacted him regarding grading of
a.
Les Hammond stated this had been a situation in the past whereby he
(Hammond) had plowed
Les Hammond noted there had been some logging done
at the bottom of the road and parts of the road had rutted and washed out. Believe they are done logging now.
MOTION:
Charles (Chuck) Graybill made a motion that the Town
NOT grade
Mann
– Yes
Graybill
– Yes
The Board of Selectmen discussed maintenance on
Class VI roads. Les Hammond stated that
Chuck Graybill stated the Town should never have
allowed improvements/maintenance to start in the beginning.
Mert Mann noted that after so many years, how can we
stop it?
Charles Graybill stated that the
Selectmen noted the following issues:
1.
2.
Jeff Williams,
3.
The question was asked how the Town will pay for the road. Would have to have a road hearing. The Town will pay for the improvements from Highway funds. As lots are developed, they will be assessed a portion of the costs of upgrading, etc. including the Chan’s.
Comments
from the General Public:
NONE
MOTION:
Mert
Mann made a motion that the Dunbarton Board of Selectmen adjourn at 9:00
p.m. Charles Graybill seconded the
motion. The motion passed unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Recording Secretary
_______________________________________
Charles
(Chuck) Graybill, Chairman
_______________________________________
Mert
Mann, Selectman
_______________________________________
Les
Hammond, Selectman